Originally posted here: https://wallethub.com/edu/best-cities-for-jobs/2173.
With 2023 behind us, it’s time to think about fresh starts, whether that means small changes or a complete life overhaul. For many people, finding a new or better job will be a top resolution.
The job market remained strong in 2023, and the unemployment rate is back around pre-pandemic levels. Some companies have even experienced labor shortages, which puts people looking for jobs in a position of leverage when it comes to negotiating their compensation and benefits.
Ultimately, your luck of finding work depends largely on location. To help you with the job hunt, WalletHub compared more than 180 U.S. cities across 31 key indicators of job-market strength. They range from job opportunities per job seeker to employment growth to the monthly average starting salary.
“With the U.S. experiencing a low unemployment rate and many employers still having labor shortages, now is an ideal time to find a job. Currently, workers have a lot of negotiating power. Well-qualified job candidates are in a great position to acquire competitive salaries and benefits.”
CASSANDRA HAPPE, WALLETHUB ANALYST
Table of Contents
Main FindingsIn-Depth Look at the Best Cities for JobsAsk the ExpertsTipsMethodology
Main Findings
11182182
City | Rank |
---|---|
Scottsdale, AZ | 1 |
Tampa, FL | 2 |
Salt Lake City, UT | 3 |
Columbia, MD | 4 |
Austin, TX | 5 |
Atlanta, GA | 6 |
Seattle, WA | 7 |
Pittsburgh, PA | 8 |
Plano, TX | 9 |
Boston, MA | 10 |
South Burlington, VT | 11 |
Portland, ME | 12 |
Tempe, AZ | 13 |
Orlando, FL | 14 |
Denver, CO | 15 |
Miami, FL | 16 |
Washington, DC | 17 |
San Jose, CA | 18 |
Madison, WI | 19 |
Minneapolis, MN | 20 |
Columbia, SC | 21 |
Charleston, SC | 22 |
Grand Rapids, MI | 23 |
San Francisco, CA | 24 |
Overland Park, KS | 25 |
Chandler, AZ | 26 |
Boise, ID | 27 |
St. Louis, MO | 28 |
Charleston, WV | 29 |
St. Petersburg, FL | 30 |
Raleigh, NC | 31 |
Virginia Beach, VA | 32 |
Huntsville, AL | 33 |
Bismarck, ND | 34 |
Irving, TX | 35 |
Lewiston, ME | 36 |
Phoenix, AZ | 37 |
West Valley City, UT | 38 |
Charlotte, NC | 39 |
Fremont, CA | 40 |
San Antonio, TX | 41 |
Fort Lauderdale, FL | 42 |
Omaha, NE | 43 |
Richmond, VA | 44 |
Dallas, TX | 45 |
Des Moines, IA | 46 |
Warwick, RI | 47 |
Gilbert, AZ | 48 |
Casper, WY | 49 |
Baltimore, MD | 50 |
Fort Worth, TX | 51 |
Manchester, NH | 52 |
Grand Prairie, TX | 53 |
Huntington Beach, CA | 54 |
Honolulu, HI | 55 |
Mesa, AZ | 56 |
Lincoln, NE | 57 |
Chesapeake, VA | 58 |
Rapid City, SD | 59 |
Knoxville, TN | 60 |
Fargo, ND | 61 |
Portland, OR | 62 |
Colorado Springs, CO | 63 |
Nashua, NH | 64 |
San Diego, CA | 65 |
Columbus, OH | 66 |
Cheyenne, WY | 67 |
Chattanooga, TN | 68 |
Jacksonville, FL | 69 |
Aurora, CO | 70 |
Arlington, TX | 71 |
Wilmington, DE | 72 |
Cincinnati, OH | 73 |
Glendale, AZ | 74 |
Juneau, AK | 75 |
Pearl City, HI | 76 |
Burlington, VT | 77 |
Aurora, IL | 78 |
Durham, NC | 79 |
Tulsa, OK | 80 |
Sioux Falls, SD | 81 |
Birmingham, AL | 82 |
Port St. Lucie, FL | 83 |
Spokane, WA | 84 |
Providence, RI | 84 |
Norfolk, VA | 86 |
Reno, NV | 87 |
Kansas City, MO | 88 |
Sacramento, CA | 89 |
Pembroke Pines, FL | 90 |
Little Rock, AR | 91 |
Chicago, IL | 92 |
Las Vegas, NV | 93 |
St. Paul, MN | 94 |
Garland, TX | 95 |
Nashville, TN | 96 |
Garden Grove, CA | 97 |
Rancho Cucamonga, CA | 98 |
Tacoma, WA | 99 |
Santa Ana, CA | 100 |
Irvine, CA | 101 |
Amarillo, TX | 102 |
Missoula, MT | 103 |
Henderson, NV | 104 |
Houston, TX | 105 |
Cedar Rapids, IA | 106 |
Cape Coral, FL | 107 |
Tallahassee, FL | 108 |
Newport News, VA | 109 |
Mobile, AL | 110 |
Salem, OR | 111 |
Los Angeles, CA | 112 |
New Orleans, LA | 113 |
Peoria, AZ | 114 |
Oklahoma City, OK | 115 |
Louisville, KY | 116 |
Wichita, KS | 117 |
Rochester, NY | 118 |
Albuquerque, NM | 119 |
Tucson, AZ | 120 |
Nampa, ID | 121 |
Lexington-Fayette, KY | 122 |
Anaheim, CA | 123 |
Riverside, CA | 124 |
Milwaukee, WI | 125 |
Fontana, CA | 126 |
Jersey City, NJ | 127 |
Santa Rosa, CA | 128 |
Ontario, CA | 129 |
Dover, DE | 130 |
Greensboro, NC | 131 |
Lubbock, TX | 132 |
Anchorage, AK | 133 |
Worcester, MA | 134 |
Corpus Christi, TX | 135 |
Glendale, CA | 136 |
Billings, MT | 137 |
Toledo, OH | 138 |
Yonkers, NY | 139 |
Cleveland, OH | 140 |
Springfield, MO | 141 |
Philadelphia, PA | 142 |
Fort Wayne, IN | 143 |
Oakland, CA | 144 |
New Haven, CT | 145 |
New York, NY | 146 |
Akron, OH | 147 |
Oceanside, CA | 148 |
Hialeah, FL | 149 |
Vancouver, WA | 150 |
Montgomery, AL | 151 |
Laredo, TX | 152 |
Buffalo, NY | 153 |
Fort Smith, AR | 154 |
El Paso, TX | 155 |
Winston-Salem, NC | 156 |
Santa Clarita, CA | 157 |
Oxnard, CA | 158 |
Indianapolis, IN | 159 |
Long Beach, CA | 160 |
Chula Vista, CA | 161 |
Huntington, WV | 162 |
Fresno, CA | 163 |
Moreno Valley, CA | 164 |
Fayetteville, NC | 165 |
Jackson, MS | 166 |
Modesto, CA | 167 |
Brownsville, TX | 168 |
North Las Vegas, NV | 169 |
Detroit, MI | 170 |
Shreveport, LA | 171 |
Baton Rouge, LA | 172 |
Bridgeport, CT | 173 |
Columbus, GA | 174 |
Memphis, TN | 175 |
Bakersfield, CA | 176 |
Stockton, CA | 177 |
Augusta, GA | 178 |
San Bernardino, CA | 179 |
Gulfport, MS | 180 |
Las Cruces, NM | 181 |
Newark, NJ | 182 |
Best Places to Find a Job
Overall Rank | City | Total Score | Job Market Rank | Socio-economics Rank |
---|---|---|---|---|
1 | Scottsdale, AZ | 66.05 | 1 | 6 |
2 | Tampa, FL | 63.14 | 5 | 25 |
3 | Salt Lake City, UT | 62.97 | 3 | 51 |
4 | Columbia, MD | 62.97 | 12 | 8 |
5 | Austin, TX | 62.92 | 7 | 16 |
6 | Atlanta, GA | 62.83 | 6 | 22 |
7 | Seattle, WA | 62.66 | 8 | 21 |
8 | Pittsburgh, PA | 62.11 | 19 | 5 |
9 | Plano, TX | 62.09 | 9 | 33 |
10 | Boston, MA | 61.97 | 4 | 63 |
11 | South Burlington, VT | 61.95 | 24 | 2 |
12 | Portland, ME | 61.83 | 17 | 10 |
13 | Tempe, AZ | 61.79 | 13 | 35 |
14 | Orlando, FL | 61.38 | 11 | 50 |
15 | Denver, CO | 61.28 | 14 | 39 |
16 | Miami, FL | 61.00 | 2 | 136 |
17 | Washington, DC | 60.78 | 18 | 30 |
18 | San Jose, CA | 60.15 | 15 | 61 |
19 | Madison, WI | 59.86 | 48 | 1 |
20 | Minneapolis, MN | 59.76 | 44 | 4 |
21 | Columbia, SC | 59.76 | 10 | 108 |
22 | Charleston, SC | 59.71 | 27 | 32 |
23 | Grand Rapids, MI | 59.11 | 25 | 58 |
24 | San Francisco, CA | 58.95 | 51 | 7 |
25 | Overland Park, KS | 58.80 | 38 | 23 |
26 | Chandler, AZ | 58.74 | 43 | 17 |
27 | Boise, ID | 58.35 | 57 | 9 |
28 | St. Louis, MO | 58.32 | 21 | 98 |
29 | Charleston, WV | 58.31 | 35 | 47 |
30 | St. Petersburg, FL | 58.25 | 34 | 53 |
31 | Raleigh, NC | 58.03 | 30 | 65 |
32 | Virginia Beach, VA | 57.81 | 42 | 48 |
33 | Huntsville, AL | 57.79 | 31 | 69 |
34 | Bismarck, ND | 57.65 | 74 | 3 |
35 | Irving, TX | 57.53 | 22 | 116 |
36 | Lewiston, ME | 57.24 | 40 | 67 |
37 | Phoenix, AZ | 57.23 | 36 | 73 |
38 | West Valley City, UT | 57.18 | 56 | 41 |
39 | Charlotte, NC | 57.10 | 26 | 112 |
40 | Fremont, CA | 56.91 | 45 | 68 |
41 | San Antonio, TX | 56.87 | 23 | 130 |
42 | Fort Lauderdale, FL | 56.79 | 28 | 117 |
43 | Omaha, NE | 56.65 | 60 | 46 |
44 | Richmond, VA | 56.56 | 47 | 81 |
45 | Dallas, TX | 56.53 | 20 | 153 |
46 | Des Moines, IA | 56.29 | 61 | 56 |
47 | Warwick, RI | 56.29 | 63 | 45 |
48 | Gilbert, AZ | 56.27 | 53 | 64 |
49 | Casper, WY | 56.11 | 71 | 31 |
50 | Baltimore, MD | 56.10 | 16 | 174 |
51 | Fort Worth, TX | 56.08 | 41 | 100 |
52 | Manchester, NH | 56.00 | 58 | 70 |
53 | Grand Prairie, TX | 55.95 | 52 | 86 |
54 | Huntington Beach, CA | 55.92 | 72 | 26 |
55 | Honolulu, HI | 55.76 | 83 | 20 |
56 | Mesa, AZ | 55.73 | 49 | 93 |
57 | Lincoln, NE | 55.72 | 93 | 11 |
58 | Chesapeake, VA | 55.70 | 59 | 74 |
59 | Rapid City, SD | 55.67 | 73 | 36 |
60 | Knoxville, TN | 55.63 | 39 | 121 |
61 | Fargo, ND | 55.41 | 87 | 18 |
62 | Portland, OR | 55.24 | 84 | 34 |
63 | Colorado Springs, CO | 55.20 | 67 | 59 |
64 | Nashua, NH | 55.05 | 96 | 15 |
65 | San Diego, CA | 54.98 | 94 | 19 |
66 | Columbus, OH | 54.82 | 78 | 52 |
67 | Cheyenne, WY | 54.80 | 89 | 28 |
68 | Chattanooga, TN | 54.72 | 29 | 171 |
69 | Jacksonville, FL | 54.69 | 50 | 123 |
70 | Aurora, CO | 54.63 | 33 | 156 |
71 | Arlington, TX | 54.53 | 37 | 151 |
72 | Wilmington, DE | 54.53 | 66 | 88 |
73 | Cincinnati, OH | 54.29 | 88 | 49 |
74 | Glendale, AZ | 54.12 | 64 | 104 |
75 | Juneau, AK | 54.03 | 104 | 29 |
76 | Pearl City, HI | 54.01 | 82 | 66 |
77 | Burlington, VT | 53.91 | 123 | 12 |
78 | Aurora, IL | 53.84 | 85 | 72 |
79 | Durham, NC | 53.79 | 54 | 135 |
80 | Tulsa, OK | 53.77 | 68 | 105 |
81 | Sioux Falls, SD | 53.72 | 111 | 24 |
82 | Birmingham, AL | 53.63 | 32 | 175 |
83 | Port St. Lucie, FL | 53.61 | 80 | 84 |
84 | Spokane, WA | 53.55 | 86 | 77 |
84 | Providence, RI | 53.55 | 92 | 62 |
86 | Norfolk, VA | 53.55 | 55 | 148 |
87 | Reno, NV | 53.52 | 107 | 42 |
88 | Kansas City, MO | 53.40 | 69 | 113 |
89 | Sacramento, CA | 53.22 | 102 | 54 |
90 | Pembroke Pines, FL | 53.21 | 75 | 111 |
91 | Little Rock, AR | 53.19 | 46 | 173 |
92 | Chicago, IL | 53.17 | 112 | 43 |
93 | Las Vegas, NV | 53.17 | 118 | 37 |
94 | St. Paul, MN | 53.08 | 117 | 40 |
95 | Garland, TX | 52.99 | 62 | 144 |
96 | Nashville, TN | 52.84 | 65 | 145 |
97 | Garden Grove, CA | 52.48 | 113 | 57 |
98 | Rancho Cucamonga, CA | 52.45 | 99 | 87 |
99 | Tacoma, WA | 52.38 | 76 | 142 |
100 | Santa Ana, CA | 52.23 | 90 | 106 |
101 | Irvine, CA | 52.20 | 137 | 27 |
102 | Amarillo, TX | 52.15 | 95 | 107 |
103 | Missoula, MT | 52.10 | 127 | 55 |
104 | Henderson, NV | 52.08 | 131 | 44 |
105 | Houston, TX | 51.85 | 81 | 138 |
106 | Cedar Rapids, IA | 51.71 | 151 | 13 |
107 | Cape Coral, FL | 51.71 | 100 | 110 |
108 | Tallahassee, FL | 51.69 | 105 | 92 |
109 | Newport News, VA | 51.65 | 77 | 152 |
110 | Mobile, AL | 51.64 | 70 | 163 |
111 | Salem, OR | 51.58 | 119 | 78 |
112 | Los Angeles, CA | 51.53 | 109 | 95 |
113 | New Orleans, LA | 51.38 | 79 | 154 |
114 | Peoria, AZ | 51.37 | 116 | 91 |
115 | Oklahoma City, OK | 51.36 | 125 | 76 |
116 | Louisville, KY | 51.07 | 103 | 114 |
117 | Wichita, KS | 51.04 | 98 | 128 |
118 | Rochester, NY | 50.96 | 122 | 97 |
119 | Albuquerque, NM | 50.86 | 121 | 99 |
120 | Tucson, AZ | 50.68 | 129 | 90 |
121 | Nampa, ID | 50.45 | 134 | 83 |
122 | Lexington-Fayette, KY | 50.36 | 140 | 71 |
123 | Anaheim, CA | 50.34 | 115 | 122 |
124 | Riverside, CA | 50.33 | 108 | 133 |
125 | Milwaukee, WI | 50.30 | 110 | 125 |
126 | Fontana, CA | 50.28 | 138 | 79 |
127 | Jersey City, NJ | 50.06 | 164 | 14 |
128 | Santa Rosa, CA | 49.97 | 135 | 94 |
129 | Ontario, CA | 49.83 | 124 | 129 |
130 | Dover, DE | 49.82 | 91 | 164 |
131 | Greensboro, NC | 49.61 | 106 | 160 |
132 | Lubbock, TX | 49.58 | 120 | 127 |
133 | Anchorage, AK | 49.55 | 136 | 102 |
134 | Worcester, MA | 49.55 | 144 | 85 |
135 | Corpus Christi, TX | 49.51 | 114 | 141 |
136 | Glendale, CA | 49.32 | 150 | 80 |
137 | Billings, MT | 49.27 | 162 | 38 |
138 | Toledo, OH | 49.23 | 133 | 124 |
139 | Yonkers, NY | 49.16 | 155 | 60 |
140 | Cleveland, OH | 49.01 | 101 | 172 |
141 | Springfield, MO | 48.70 | 132 | 150 |
142 | Philadelphia, PA | 48.65 | 143 | 115 |
143 | Fort Wayne, IN | 48.60 | 130 | 139 |
144 | Oakland, CA | 48.58 | 126 | 155 |
145 | New Haven, CT | 48.47 | 141 | 132 |
146 | New York, NY | 48.25 | 149 | 120 |
147 | Akron, OH | 48.08 | 139 | 146 |
148 | Oceanside, CA | 47.86 | 153 | 119 |
149 | Hialeah, FL | 47.82 | 97 | 180 |
150 | Vancouver, WA | 47.70 | 147 | 143 |
151 | Montgomery, AL | 47.68 | 128 | 169 |
152 | Laredo, TX | 47.60 | 159 | 89 |
153 | Buffalo, NY | 47.57 | 158 | 96 |
154 | Fort Smith, AR | 47.16 | 146 | 158 |
155 | El Paso, TX | 46.92 | 168 | 82 |
156 | Winston-Salem, NC | 46.90 | 142 | 168 |
157 | Santa Clarita, CA | 46.88 | 170 | 75 |
158 | Oxnard, CA | 46.70 | 167 | 101 |
159 | Indianapolis, IN | 46.64 | 145 | 166 |
160 | Long Beach, CA | 46.62 | 156 | 139 |
161 | Chula Vista, CA | 46.58 | 161 | 118 |
162 | Huntington, WV | 45.92 | 166 | 126 |
163 | Fresno, CA | 45.50 | 157 | 161 |
164 | Moreno Valley, CA | 45.50 | 165 | 147 |
165 | Fayetteville, NC | 45.11 | 163 | 162 |
166 | Jackson, MS | 45.06 | 148 | 179 |
167 | Modesto, CA | 44.78 | 176 | 109 |
168 | Brownsville, TX | 44.63 | 172 | 137 |
169 | North Las Vegas, NV | 44.48 | 173 | 131 |
170 | Detroit, MI | 44.26 | 152 | 181 |
171 | Shreveport, LA | 44.00 | 160 | 177 |
172 | Baton Rouge, LA | 43.97 | 169 | 165 |
173 | Bridgeport, CT | 43.95 | 171 | 159 |
174 | Columbus, GA | 43.86 | 174 | 149 |
175 | Memphis, TN | 43.76 | 154 | 182 |
176 | Bakersfield, CA | 43.10 | 180 | 134 |
177 | Stockton, CA | 42.67 | 177 | 157 |
178 | Augusta, GA | 42.62 | 175 | 176 |
179 | San Bernardino, CA | 41.72 | 179 | 167 |
180 | Gulfport, MS | 40.97 | 178 | 178 |
181 | Las Cruces, NM | 40.06 | 182 | 103 |
182 | Newark, NJ | 39.37 | 181 | 170 |
Note: With the exception of “Total Score,” all of the columns in the table above depict the relative rank of that city, where a rank of 1 represents the best conditions for that metric category.
In-Depth Look at the Best Cities for Jobs
Scottsdale, AZ
Scottsdale, AZ is the best city for jobs in 2024, in large part because it boasts the highest job growth in the nation, at nearly 12%. This ensures there will be plenty of hiring opportunities for people entering the workforce. Scottsdale ranks first when it comes to internship opportunities as well, so it’s great for people looking for workforce experience during school.
Scottsdale doesn’t just deliver quantity when it comes to jobs, though – it has quality as well, as evidenced by the fact that it has the fifth-highest median annual income in the country, when adjusted for the cost of living. It also provides a good quality of life, ranking high among the best cities for both families and recreation.
Tampa, FL
The second-best city for jobs is Tampa, FL, which stands out because of the quality of its companies. Tampa has the fifth-highest number of full-time job opportunities at companies rated 4.5+ stars on Glassdoor relative to the size of its labor force.
Once you have a job in Tampa, it’s likely you’ll be able to keep it as well, since the city has one of the best job-security rates in the country. Its employment growth rate is not too shabby, either, ranking sixth at slightly over 10%.
If looking for love is a priority on top of finding a job, you’ll also be happy to know that Tampa is the seventh-best city for singles.
Salt Lake City, UT
Salt Lake City ranks as the third-best city for jobs, and one of the major contributing factors is that it has one of the lowest unemployment rates in the country, at just 3%. It also ranks first when it comes to net employment outlook, which measures the quarterly percentage of employers who expect to add employees minus the percentage who expect to have fewer of them.
One especially good feature of the job market in Salt Lake City is that employers are banned from asking about candidates’ previous salaries. This measure helps ensure that people are offered fair wages and that women and people of color in particular are less likely to experience systemic pay gaps.
Job Opportunities
Most
- 1. Columbia, SC
- 2. Charleston, WV
- 3. St. Louis, MO
- 4. Orlando, FL
- 5. Birmingham, AL
Fewest
- 175. Los Angeles, CA
- 176. Stockton, CA
- 177. Detroit, MI
- 178. Santa Clarita, CA
- 179. North Las Vegas, NV
Employment Growth
Highest
- 1. Scottsdale, AZ
- 2. Aurora, IL
- 3. Tempe, AZ
- 4. San Antonio, TX
- 5. Hialeah, FL
Lowest
- 176. Buffalo, NY
- 177. Newark, NJ
- 178. Jersey City, NJ
- 179. Worcester, MA
- 180. Irvine, CA
Show More
*Note: Adjusted for cost of livingEasiest to Find a…Easiest to Find a…Most Difficult to F…Most Difficult to F…Scottsdale, AZSeattle, WAPittsburgh, PATempe, AZOrlando, FLDenver, COFremont, CASt. Louis, MORaleigh, NCManchester, NHBoise, IDMadison, WIPhoenix, AZColumbia, MDDes Moines, IAWilmington, DEOmaha, NEGrand Prairie, TXRichmond, VAAurora, ILChesapeake, VAReno, NVSt. Paul, MNKnoxville, TNPlano, TXJacksonville, FLRiverside, CAArlington, TXOntario, CABaltimore, MDBirmingham, ALGarland, TXChicago, ILSioux Falls, SDNew Orleans, LAPort St. Lucie, FLNashville, TNGlendale, CALittle Rock, ARCape Coral, FLTulsa, OKNewport News, VAYonkers, NYTucson, AZAlbuquerque, NMChula Vista, CASanta Clarita, CAOxnard, CAMobile, ALAnaheim, CASpringfield, MOLong Beach, CACleveland, OHEl Paso, TXAkron, OHBakersfield, CABridgeport, CTStockton, CABaton Rouge, LABrownsville, TXGulfport, MS0501001502…0100200300400500600Best & Worst Cities for Jobs RankFastest Growing Cities Rank
State | Best & Worst Cities for Jobs Rank | Fastest Growing Cities Rank | Category |
---|---|---|---|
Scottsdale, AZ | 1 | 73 | Easiest to Find a Job & Fastest Growing |
Seattle, WA | 7 | 33 | Easiest to Find a Job & Fastest Growing |
Pittsburgh, PA | 8 | 380 | Easiest to Find a Job & Slowest Growing |
Tempe, AZ | 13 | 25 | Easiest to Find a Job & Fastest Growing |
Orlando, FL | 14 | 43 | Easiest to Find a Job & Fastest Growing |
Denver, CO | 15 | 41 | Easiest to Find a Job & Fastest Growing |
Fremont, CA | 40 | 134 | Easiest to Find a Job & Fastest Growing |
St. Louis, MO | 28 | 469 | Easiest to Find a Job & Slowest Growing |
Raleigh, NC | 31 | 150 | Easiest to Find a Job & Fastest Growing |
Manchester, NH | 52 | 342 | Easiest to Find a Job & Slowest Growing |
Boise, ID | 27 | 156 | Easiest to Find a Job & Fastest Growing |
Madison, WI | 19 | 197 | Easiest to Find a Job & Fastest Growing |
Phoenix, AZ | 37 | 93 | Easiest to Find a Job & Fastest Growing |
Columbia, MD | 4 | 471 | Easiest to Find a Job & Slowest Growing |
Des Moines, IA | 46 | 274 | Easiest to Find a Job & Slowest Growing |
Wilmington, DE | 72 | 394 | Easiest to Find a Job & Slowest Growing |
Omaha, NE | 43 | 193 | Easiest to Find a Job & Fastest Growing |
Grand Prairie, TX | 53 | 214 | Easiest to Find a Job & Fastest Growing |
Richmond, VA | 44 | 183 | Easiest to Find a Job & Fastest Growing |
Aurora, IL | 78 | 400 | Easiest to Find a Job & Slowest Growing |
Chesapeake, VA | 58 | 335 | Easiest to Find a Job & Slowest Growing |
Reno, NV | 87 | 55 | Easiest to Find a Job & Fastest Growing |
St. Paul, MN | 94 | 269 | Most Difficult to Find a Job & Slowest Growing |
Knoxville, TN | 60 | 373 | Easiest to Find a Job & Slowest Growing |
Plano, TX | 9 | 289 | Easiest to Find a Job & Slowest Growing |
Jacksonville, FL | 69 | 130 | Easiest to Find a Job & Fastest Growing |
Riverside, CA | 124 | 185 | Most Difficult to Find a Job & Fastest Growing |
Arlington, TX | 71 | 227 | Easiest to Find a Job & Fastest Growing |
Ontario, CA | 129 | 46 | Most Difficult to Find a Job & Fastest Growing |
Baltimore, MD | 50 | 479 | Easiest to Find a Job & Slowest Growing |
Birmingham, AL | 82 | 398 | Easiest to Find a Job & Slowest Growing |
Garland, TX | 95 | 278 | Most Difficult to Find a Job & Slowest Growing |
Chicago, IL | 92 | 367 | Most Difficult to Find a Job & Slowest Growing |
Sioux Falls, SD | 81 | 198 | Easiest to Find a Job & Fastest Growing |
New Orleans, LA | 113 | 337 | Most Difficult to Find a Job & Slowest Growing |
Port St. Lucie, FL | 83 | 15 | Easiest to Find a Job & Fastest Growing |
Nashville, TN | 96 | 109 | Most Difficult to Find a Job & Fastest Growing |
Glendale, CA | 136 | 257 | Most Difficult to Find a Job & Fastest Growing |
Little Rock, AR | 91 | 407 | Easiest to Find a Job & Slowest Growing |
Cape Coral, FL | 107 | 14 | Most Difficult to Find a Job & Fastest Growing |
Tulsa, OK | 80 | 456 | Easiest to Find a Job & Slowest Growing |
Newport News, VA | 109 | 483 | Most Difficult to Find a Job & Slowest Growing |
Yonkers, NY | 139 | 468 | Most Difficult to Find a Job & Slowest Growing |
Tucson, AZ | 120 | 314 | Most Difficult to Find a Job & Slowest Growing |
Albuquerque, NM | 119 | 437 | Most Difficult to Find a Job & Slowest Growing |
Chula Vista, CA | 161 | 92 | Most Difficult to Find a Job & Fastest Growing |
Santa Clarita, CA | 157 | 29 | Most Difficult to Find a Job & Fastest Growing |
Oxnard, CA | 158 | 305 | Most Difficult to Find a Job & Slowest Growing |
Mobile, AL | 110 | 443 | Most Difficult to Find a Job & Slowest Growing |
Anaheim, CA | 123 | 263 | Most Difficult to Find a Job & Slowest Growing |
Springfield, MO | 141 | 306 | Most Difficult to Find a Job & Slowest Growing |
Long Beach, CA | 160 | 307 | Most Difficult to Find a Job & Slowest Growing |
Cleveland, OH | 140 | 470 | Most Difficult to Find a Job & Slowest Growing |
El Paso, TX | 155 | 390 | Most Difficult to Find a Job & Slowest Growing |
Akron, OH | 147 | 460 | Most Difficult to Find a Job & Slowest Growing |
Bakersfield, CA | 176 | 300 | Most Difficult to Find a Job & Slowest Growing |
Bridgeport, CT | 173 | 503 | Most Difficult to Find a Job & Slowest Growing |
Stockton, CA | 177 | 135 | Most Difficult to Find a Job & Fastest Growing |
Baton Rouge, LA | 172 | 501 | Most Difficult to Find a Job & Slowest Growing |
Brownsville, TX | 168 | 406 | Most Difficult to Find a Job & Slowest Growing |
Gulfport, MS | 180 | 476 | Most Difficult to Find a Job & Slowest Growing |
Ask the Experts
The job-hunting process can still be scary, especially during the stress of high inflation. To ease the burden on job seekers, we asked a panel of experts to share their thoughts on the following key questions:
- What is your prediction for the job market in 2024?
- Which fields are expected to grow the most in the coming years?
- Recent evidence suggests fewer people are moving across state lines in search for work – why do you think this is and what can be done to increase geographic mobility?
- Which are the most common mistakes job seekers make when seeking employment?
Ralph E. McKinney
Associate Professor of Management at the Brad D. Smith Schools of Business at the Lewis College of Business – Marshall University
READ MORE
Sean Walker
Ph.D., MBA – Faculty Representative, UT Board of Trustees – ERS Committee; Secretary, University Faculty Council (2023-2024 AY); Chair, Personnel Policies Committee (2023-2024 AY); Professor of Behavioral Management, College of Business and Global Affairs – University of Tennessee at Martin
READ MORE
Dr. Ashley Hicks
Director of Employer Recruitment and Engagement, Northwestern Career Advancement – Northwestern University
READ MORE
Dr. Melissa Gutworth
Associate Professor of Management, Feliciano School of Business – Montclair State University
READ MORE
Alper Kayaalp
Ph.D. – Assistant Professor of Industrial/Organizational Psychology – University of Houston – Clear Lake
READ MORE
John W. Spadaccini
M.S. – Director of Career Services – Ave Maria University
READ MORE
Tips for Finding a Good Job
- Look in cities that provide the best conditions: Begin your job search in cities with high job growth rates, substantial median incomes, and a diverse range of industries. However, make sure that any city you consider not only offers career opportunities but also fits your needs when it comes to things like safety, recreation and climate.
- Consider online jobs: Many positions in the post-pandemic era now allow you to work from home, eliminating the need to move altogether and saving you money by not requiring a commute.
- Use job-finding resources: College alumni networks and job portals can be valuable assets. Posting your resume on online platforms and networking on sites like LinkedIn broadens your visibility. Just look at any unsolicited offers you receive carefully to make sure they’re legitimate.
- Expand outside your field: Your knowledge and skills, especially transferable skills such as technological proficiency, effective communication, and creativity, may prove beneficial in adjacent industries. Exploring diverse fields can lead you to career paths you might not normally have considered where your expertise remains relevant.
- Negotiate to be paid what you’re worth: Given current labor shortages in certain industries, recognize your bargaining power as a job-seeker. Before accepting an offer, negotiate to secure a competitive salary and comprehensive benefits package.
Methodology
In order to determine the best job markets in the U.S., WalletHub compared 182 cities — including the 150 most populated U.S. cities, plus at least two of the most populated cities in each state — across two key dimensions, “Job Market” and “Socio-economics.” We assigned a heavier weight to the former, considering the fact that factors in that category most heavily influence a job seeker’s decision in terms of relocation for employment.
We then evaluated the two dimensions using 31 relevant metrics, which are listed below with their corresponding weights. Each metric was graded on a 100-point scale, with a score of 100 representing the most favorable conditions for job seekers. Data for metrics marked with an asterisk (*) were available at state level only.
Finally, we determined each city’s weighted average across all metrics to calculate its overall score and used the resulting scores to rank-order our sample. In determining our sample, we considered only the city proper in each case, excluding cities in the surrounding metro area.
Job Market – Total Points: 80
- Job Opportunities: Double Weight (~6.53 Points)
Note: This metric was calculated as follows: Number of Job Openings per Number of Population in Labor Force Minus Unemployment Rate. - Employment Growth: Double Weight (~6.53 Points)
Note: This metric measures the rate of annual job growth adjusted by the working-age population growth. - Monthly Average Starting Salary: Full Weight (~3.27 Points)
- Unemployment Rate: Double Weight (~6.53 Points)
- Underemployment Rate: Full Weight (~3.27 Points)
- Industry Variety: Full Weight (~3.27 Points)
- Employment Outlook: Double Weight (~6.53 Points)
Note: This metric is based on the Manpower Employment Outlook Survey. - Automation Risk: Full Weight (~3.27 Points)
Note: This metric measures the share of jobs at risk for automation. - Job Security: Full Weight (~3.27 Points)
Note: This metric was calculated as follows: (Number of Employees in August 2023 – Number of Employees in August 2022) / Number of Employees in August 2022. - Job Satisfaction: Full Weight (~3.27 Points)
- Share of Engaged Workers*: Full Weight (~3.27 Points)
Note: This metric is based on Gallup’s “State of the American Workplace” report. Gallup defines engaged employees as those who are involved in, enthusiastic about and committed to their work and workplace. - Retirement Access & Participation: Full Weight (~3.27 Points)
Note: This metric considers only employer-based retirement plans. - Access to Employee Benefits: Full Weight (~3.27 Points)
Note: This metric measures the share of employees with private health insurance. - Presence of Work-Share Programs*: Half Weight (~1.63 Points)
Note: This binary metric measures the presence or absence of state programs that allow employers to temporarily reduce work hours of employees instead of laying them off during economic downturns. - State’s Statute on Hiring Based on Salary History*: Half Weight (~1.63 Points)
Note: This metric measures the presence or absence of salary history bans in a state. - Full-Time Employment: Full Weight (~3.27 Points)
Note: This metric measures the number of part-time employees for every 100 full-time employees. - Access to Internships: Full Weight (~3.27 Points)
Note: This metric measures the number of internships per total civilian population aged 16 to 24 in the labor force. - 4+ Star Full Time Job Opportunities per Total People in Labor Force: Full Weight (~3.27 Points)
Note: This metric measures the number of full time job opportunities at 4+ star rated companies on Glasssdoor.com per the total people in the labor force. - Apprentice-Trainee Jobs as Share of Total Jobs Posted on Glassdoor.com: Half Weight (~1.63 Points)
Note: Apprentice-trainee jobs refers to on-the-job training. - Share of Workers in Poverty: Double Weight (~6.53 Points)
Note: This metric measures the share of employed residents whose incomes are below the poverty line. - Disability-Friendliness of Employers: Full Weight (~3.27 Points)
Note: This metric measures the share of persons with disabilities who are employed.
Socio-economics – Total Points: 20
- Median Annual Income: Full Weight (~2.00 Points)
Note: This metric was adjusted for the cost of living. - Average Work & Commute Time: Full Weight (~2.00 Points)
Note: This metric measures the average length of a workday and the average commute time. - Transit Accessibility of Workplace: Full Weight (~2.00 Points)
Note: This metric measures the number of jobs accessible by a 30-minute transit ride per total civilian workforce. - Transit Score: Full Weight (~2.00 Points)
Note: Transit Score is a patented measure of how well a location is served by public transit. - Housing Affordability: Full Weight (~2.00 Points)
Note: This metric was calculated as follows: Housing Costs (accounts for both rental and sale prices) / Median Annual Household Income. - Annual Transportation Costs: Full Weight (~2.00 Points)
- Safety: Full Weight (~2.00 Points)
Note: This metric measures the crime rate. - Family-Friendliness: Full Weight (~2.00 Points)
Note: This metric is based on WalletHub’s “Best & Worst Places to Raise a Family” ranking. - Dating-Friendliness: Full Weight (~2.00 Points)
Note: This metric is based on WalletHub’s “Best & Worst Cities for Singles” ranking. - Recreation-Friendliness: Full Weight (~2.00 Points)
Note: This metric is based on WalletHub’s “Best & Worst Cities for Recreation” ranking.
Sources: Data used to create this ranking were collected as of November 29, 2023 from the U.S. Census Bureau, Bureau of Labor Statistics, Federal Bureau of Investigation, U.S Department of Housing and Urban Development, Council for Community and Economic Research, Indeed, Center for Neighborhood Technology, The Pew Charitable Trusts, National Conference of State Legislatures, Chegg Internships, Glassdoor, ManpowerGroup, Chmura Economics & Analytics, Kellogg School of Management, Northwestern University, Gallup-Sharecare, Industry Dive, Walk Score and WalletHub research.